[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Going to the Manor
- To: harland@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Going to the Manor
- From: SD Anderson <sdanderson4_5@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:22:26 -0800 (PST)
- Delivered-to: unknown
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yQqo6z52CY4nFbX20jjuTunqRqP4m49TUj9fS5Px/d1+McwUdt+ocrlsWMrayVRL3WZqBQPzWrdQ9tPh7p2nCOJT+JceYxorkBqJIJSTlIM5qgicl6afxL3GyKszDFWQeUUkwj7eF2yukIsxdE08WixRhsl9gtEMKBlvq8CmFTM= ;
- In-reply-to: <43A24862.70300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: harland@xxxxxxxxxx
--- Michael Kelly <miteke@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hmmm. The email handler is automatically adding the
> > chars, but from
> now on I will follow this protocol uinless I forget
> that Netscape just
> added the formatting.
If you're not using Yahoo's mail program it probably
doesn't matter. Something just makes a mess of quotes
after a few rounds.
The astericks are primarily MY way of avoiding it's
problems. If you don't have those problems, you
probably don't need to bog down with an alternate
protocol yourself.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com